Legal Opinion
United States v. United Technologies Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 3, 2016No. Case No. 3:99-cv-093PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT, DOC. 457, AND DENYING-IN-PART THE UNITED STATES’ CROSS-MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT. DOC. 464.
THOMAS M. ROSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court are Defendant United Technologies Corporation’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment, Doc. 457, and Plaintiff United States’ Cross-Motion for Entry of Final Judgment. Doc. 464. The case is currently before the Court on a second remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the' Sixth Circuit.
I. INTRODUCTION
The United…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. James E. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Isaac FORD, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNIROYAL PENSION PLAN, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Albert Malvino v. Paul DelluniversitaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Corcoran v. Holley (In re Holley)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- ams Sensors USA Inc. v. Intersil CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020