Legal Opinion

Capek v. Levis

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 25, 1932No. Patent Appeal 2832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

On September 6, 1924, the appellants Capek and Van Den Broecke filed their application in the United States Patent Office for a patent upon improvements in telephone systems. On September 4, 1925, the appellee, Levis, filed his application, which concedodly covers the same subject-matter. An interference was declared. On this interference, Levis took testimony; the appellants, in their behalf, introduced certified copies of foreign patents covering the same subject-matter. None of these are important here, except the British patent, No. 228,593, granted upon an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gowen v. HendryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Prichard v. SetzlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
  3. In re PrichardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fageol v. MidboeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  2. Phelan v. GreenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  3. Chicago Rawhide Mfg. Co. v. National Motor Bearing Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1943
  4. Fageol v. MidboeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API