Capek v. Levis
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
On September 6, 1924, the appellants Capek and Van Den Broecke filed their application in the United States Patent Office for a patent upon improvements in telephone systems. On September 4, 1925, the appellee, Levis, filed his application, which concedodly covers the same subject-matter. An interference was declared. On this interference, Levis took testimony; the appellants, in their behalf, introduced certified copies of foreign patents covering the same subject-matter. None of these are important here, except the British patent, No. 228,593, granted upon an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gowen v. HendryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Prichard v. SetzlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- In re PrichardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fageol v. MidboeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- Phelan v. GreenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Chicago Rawhide Mfg. Co. v. National Motor Bearing Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1943
- Fageol v. MidboeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932