Legal Opinion

Clark v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1898No. 127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Rooks district court; Charles W. Smith, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wells, J :

On November 15, 1895, William Ford brought an action in the Rooks county district court against the Union Pacific Railway Company to recover *333$250 as damages for killing a jack. Subsequently the plaintiffs in error were made parties by an amended petition. The issues were duly made up and the case tried to a jury and the court. The jury returned a verdict for ninety dollars damages and thirty-five dollars as attorney’s fee, in favor of the plaintiff. This verdict was approved by the court and a judgment rendered thereon, and the case brought…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Xenia Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Kansas Pacific Rly. Co. v. MowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Craver v. HornburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Missouri River R. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Royal Insurance v. BarrsSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. Pappe v. American Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Smith v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Houston Packing Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Norton Farms, Inc. v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API