Legal Opinion

State v. Sinclair

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 7, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARDEN, Justice.

On appeal. From a verdict of guilty upon a charge of breaking, entering and larceny, for the defense of which appellant was provided with court appointed counsel, appeal is taken upon two points: (1) The verdict is not supported by the evidence, and (2) the attorney appointed by the court failed to challenge prospective juror R although the respondent requested that said juror be challenged. New counsel was court appointed for purposes of the appeal.

Relative the alleged insufficiency of the evidence, the accused offering none, undisputed facts justify a finding that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. WightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Roosevelt Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. Diggs v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  4. Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. United States Ex Rel. Feeley v. RagenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leasure v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. State v. StinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Tribou v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. State v. McIntyreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  5. Tribou v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API