Weiss-Lawrence, Inc. v. Riley
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The agreed statement of facts establishes that this dispute relates to the status under the Unemployment Compensation Act of certain home workers “who lace and bead moccasins on premises other than those of the petitioner” at such times as they may select, without its direct supervision and inspection but according to its specifications, for remuneration which exceeds the minimum requirements of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The statement also establishes the following facts:
The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturing shoes and moccasins at Dover, and furnishes…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Industrial Commission v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Creameries of America, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Murphy v. DaumitIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Wallace v. AnnunzioIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burns v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Boston Bicycle Couriers, Inc. v. Deputy Director of the Division of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Appeal of Work-a-Day of Nashua, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Vincent v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973