Legal Opinion

Fields v. City of Leavenworth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1936No. 32,724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The .opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action against the city of Leavenworth to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of stepping and falling upon some ice located on the sidewalk in front of an occupied business building. Defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was sustained. The exclusion of a certain exhibit and the sustaining of the demurrer form the basis of the appeal.

The building in front of which the accident occurred was a two-story structure and was owned by Walter Yoakum. The tenant was the Southwest Bell Telephone…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Emporia v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. City of Emporia v. SchmidlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Corlett v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Langan v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  5. Smith v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Moore v. WinnigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Wright v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API