Legal Opinion

Baker v. Hill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 18, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.

This is an appeal by a taxpayer from a decree of the chancery court sustaining a demurrer to and dismissing for want of equity a complaint filed by him seeking to restrain the members of the Arkansas Construction Commission from carrying out the provisions of an act of the Legislature of 1929 to provide adequate buildings for the Hospital for Nervous Diseases and for the Tuberculosis Sanatorium and the issuance of State bonds therefor.

The Legislature of 1929 first passed an act to provide for the levying and collecting of a tax on incomes, which was to be known as the Income Tax Act of 1929.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Bush v. MartineauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Eliasberg Bros. Mercantile Co. v. GrimesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Stanley v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Fort Smith v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Featherstone v. NormanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Botkin v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Davis v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. People v. CambaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API