Legal Opinion

Micklon v. Dudley

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2007No. DA 06-0414PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Dennis Micklon appeals from the decision of the District Court for the Nineteenth Judicial District, Lincoln County, holding that Arthur and Lynn C. Dudleys’ 3,000-square-foot shop did not violate a restrictive covenant limiting lot use within the parties’ subdivision to residential use. We reverse.

¶2 We restate the issue on appeal as follows: Did the District Court err in concluding that the shop on the Dudleys’ lot did not violate the subdivision’s restrictive covenant mandating that “[n]o lot shall be used for any purpose except residential use”?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mary J. Baker Revocable Trust v. Cenex Harvest States, Cooperatives, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re A.N.W.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Newman v. WittmerMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Sandy Point Improvement Co. v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Denton v. First Interstate Bank of CommerceMontana Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blazer v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. McKay v. Wilderness Development, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Micklon v. DudleyMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Micklon v. DudleyMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Blazer v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API