Legal Opinion

Belback v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1966No. Civ. A. Nos. 65-863, 65-864PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

In these diversity personal injury actions, the plaintiffs move under Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P., for production of statements taken from each of them by a representative of the defendant company. Similar supporting affidavits were filed by the plaintiffs; no counter-affidavits were filed by the defendant.

It appears from the record that the plaintiffs allegedly were injured in a motor vehicle accident on or about October 3, 1964. Within approximately two weeks each plaintiff was separately interviewed by the defendant’s representative while each was confined to his home…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  3. Brown v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Hayman v. Pullman Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1948
  5. The New York Central Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Alva O. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Merrin Jewelry Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  2. Torres-Paulett v. Tradition Mariner, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1994
  3. Walls v. International Paper Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  4. Dingler v. Halcyon Lijn N. V.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Straughan v. Barge MVL No. 802District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API