State v. Ely
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Kingsbury County. Hon. ChaRles S. Wi-iiting, Judge. Charles E. Ely was convicted of engaging in the business of selling intoxicating liquor without a license, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.
Upon an information duly filed by the state’s attorney of Kingsbury county, the defendant was tried and convicted of the offense of'engaging in the business of selling intoxicating liquors at retail without a license. From this judgment, the defendant has appealed to- this court.
The information, omitting formal parts, is as follows: “That on the ist day of May, A. D. 1907, and thereafter continuously down to the 10th day of-June, A. D. 1907, inclusive, in the county of Kingsbury, state of South Dakota, the said Charles E. Ely did *489then' and there engage in the business .of selling, brewed,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Welsh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. MudieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. FunkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- State v. McNearySupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pennell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. TenintyIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Jacob Hoffmann Brewing Co. v. McElligottDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1919
- State v. GuySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. HaysSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.