Legal Opinion

State v. Guy

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County. Hon. J. H. McCoy, Judge. John H. Guy was convicted of selling and keeping for sale intoxicating liquor without a license, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

If any crime is charged in this action, it is one defined by sections 2834, '2838, Rev. Pol. Code. Section' 2834 requires all persons whose business, in _ whole or in part, consists in selling or keeping for sale certain liquors, at retail or wholesale, to annually pay certain sums for license to' conduct such business. Section 2838 declares if any person shall engage or be engaged in any business requiring the payment of license under section 2834,' without having paid the required license and without having the receipt and notice of such license posted, he shall be deemed guilty of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. MudieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. ElySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Sioux Falls v. KohlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. City of Sioux Falls v. KohlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API