Legal Opinion
H. D. Hudson Manufacturing Company v. Food MacHinery and Chemical Corporation
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 21, 1956No. Patent Appeal 6178PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, speaking through the Assistant Commissioner, 101 U.S.P.Q. 372, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences which dismissed appellant’s notice of opposition to the registration by appellee, under the Trade-Mark Act of 1946, 15 U. S.C.A. § 1051 et seq., of the notation “Rotomist” for agricultural and horticultural spraying and dusting machines in class 23, cutlery, machinery, and tools, and parts thereof.
Appellee alleged March 20, 1948, as. the date of first use of the involved mark in the commerce…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schering & Glatz, Inc. v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Nestle's Milk Products, Inc. v. Baker Importing Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- North Star Mfg. Co. v. Wells Lamont Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. United Conditioning Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Younghusband v. Kurlash Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.