Legal Opinion

State v. De Lorenzo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 6, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On error to the Hudson Quarter Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, Chief Justice.

The indictment upon which the defendants in this case were convicted charged them with the offence of keeping a disorderly house. When the case was moved for trial the defence interposed a challenge to the array of petit jurors then in attendance upon the court, on the ground that the panel was not composed of jurors who were drawn for the then present service by the sheriff, but that, in violation of the constitutional guaranty of trial by jury, it was composed partly of j urors drawn for that service by the sheriff, and partly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  2. Linden Park Blood Horse Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  3. J. L. Mott Iron Works v. GunnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sexton ex rel. Kin v. Newark District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. State v. De LorenzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. State v. SchlosserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  4. State v. WitteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. State v. SweetSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API