Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Mehl

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Defendant in error Minnie Mehl brought an action in the court of common pleas against Clifford M. Stegner, as director of the department of buildings of the city of Cincinnati, and the city of Cincinnati. The prayer of the petition in the case is that the zoning code of ordinances of the city of Cincinnati, in so far as it prohibits the use of plaintiff’s premises for the construction of a building for business purposes in the district zoned as residence C district, may be declared unconstitutional and void; that a mandatory injunction may issue against said defendants, requiring them to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Dollenmayer v. PryorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Northern Indiana Land Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Weller & Sons v. RensfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wolpe v. PoretskyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. DeBlasiis v. Bartell & OlivetoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Joseph Skillken & Co. v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Coronet Homes, Inc. v. McKenzieNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Joseph Skillken and Co. v. City of Toledo, and Ragan Woods Homeowners Association, Inc., Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants. Joseph Skillken and Company v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API