Legal Opinion
Pomerance v. Pomerance
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKadien, J.
This action for judgment under section 473 of the Civil Practice Act to declare (1) the nullity of the divorce obtained by the defendant, William Pomerance, against the plaintiff in the State of Nevada, (2) that she remains his lawful wife, and (3) that the defendants are not husband and wife (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1134) was submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts and a notice to admit, pursuant to section 322 of the Civil Practice Act!
The plaintiff and the defendant William Pomerance (hereinafter referred to as the “ husband ”) were married in New York City in December, 1927,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Reese v. ReeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Fondiller v. FondillerNew York Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- Long v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Elkind v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Hines v. HinesNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Zekowski v. ZekowskiNew York Supreme Court · 1948