Legal Opinion

Elkind v. City of New Rochelle

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1957PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frederick G. Schmidt, Off. Ref.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment, declaring a provision of the City Charter of New Rochelle, allowing a referendum on amendments to the *297zoning ordinance, invalid. The plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings, and this motion has been referred to the undersigned to hear and determine.

Only a question of law is here involved, as the facts are not in dispute. The facts are as follows: On August 27, 1956, the Common Council adopted an amendment to its zoning ordinance by which its established an Office Building District, designated District 01,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Matter of McCabe v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. National Bank of Chemung v. City of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dickman v. School District No. 62cOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Westgate Families v. County Clerk of the Inc. County of Los AlamosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  3. West v. City of PortageMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hancock v. RouseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Elliott v. City of ClawsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API