Legal Opinion

State v. Simmons

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1984No. 8317SC574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of marijuana seized from a cornfield and from his home. After a hearing on defendant’s motion, the court made findings and conclusions which are summarized as follows:

On 14 July 1982 employees of Duke Power Company were inspecting power lines and power line poles along a power line right of way located on land leased by defendant. While performing his duties one of the employees observed what appeared to be marijuana growing in a cornfield on the land. He broke off part of one plant and took…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. . WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. GrindstaffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API