Legal Opinion

In the Disciplinary Matter Involving Beconovich

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1994No. S-5780PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

A grievance was filed with the Alaska Bar Association (Bar) against Robert M. Beeono-vich. He did not respond. Under Alaska Bar Rule 22(a), his failure to respond was deemed an admission of the allegations in the grievance. In proceedings' before the Bar Area Hearing Committee (Committee), and then before the Bar Disciplinary Board (Board), Beconovieh requested that the deemed admissions be set aside. Both the Committee and Board declined to do so. The Board, following the general recommendation of the Committee, has recommended to this court that Beconovieh be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hertz v. BerzanskeAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving SchulerAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Agostinho v. Fairbanks Clinic PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Matter of StumpAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WeisbardSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Zok v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001
  3. Case v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API