Richardson v. Jallen Investment Group, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Leo J. Hayes and Mary Ann Catón (collectively Defendants) each appeal the judgment entered in favor of David Richardson on the various claims and counterclaims pursued in this litigation. 1 We dismiss the appeals because, under the circumstances, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to set aside its dismissal with prejudice of all the parties’ claims and counterclaims more than thirty days after the entry of the dismissal. 2
These appeals followed the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of Richardson on all claims and counterclaims. Hayes and Catón present eleven points on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Steiner v. VatterottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Gregory v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Kieffer v. NiemeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Jeffery v. JefferyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- Golden Valley Disposal, LLC v. Jenkins Diesel Power, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Norfolk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Martin, Malec & Leopold, P.C. v. DenenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Blake & Davis, LLC v. ThornhillMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Yusupova v. NobleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017