Legal Opinion

Mayo Clinic v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 6, 2019No. 0:16-cv-03113Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Mayo Clinic, a Minnesota Corporation, on File No. 16-cv-03113 (ECT/KMM) its own behalf and as a successor in interest to Mayo Foundation, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. United States of America, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Mark P. Rotatori, Jones Day, Chicago, IL; and Annamarie A. Daley, Caroline Heicklen, and Andrew Leiendecker, Jones Day, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff Mayo Clinic. Curtis J. Weidler, Samuel P. Robins, and Eric M. Aberg, U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API