Legal Opinion
Eisenrich v. Minneapolis Retail Meat Cutters & Food Handlers Pension Fund
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 15, 2003No. CIV.02-984 (DSD/SRN)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the cross-motions of the parties for summary judgment. For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion is granted and defendant’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND 1
Defendant is an employee benefit plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The terms of the plan and requirements for participation are set forth in the Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust (“Declaration”), the Pension Plan Plan Document (“PPPD”) and the Summary Plan Description (“Plan Summary”). 2 Plaintiff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Drexel Finley and Grace Finley v. Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Joseph D. Griggs v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Joseph D. Griggs v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westley v. MannDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Njema v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- DRB 24, LLC v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013