Brown v. Snider
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mecosta; Palmer, J. Assumpsit by Frank E. Brown and John Sehler,. copartners as Brown & Sehler, against Jacob Snider, for goods bargained and sold. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiffs live in Grand Rapids, and are wholesale dealers in robes, blankets, and harnesses. The defendant resides at Remus, and is a retailer of the same line of goods. On the 31st day -of May, 1899, the agent of plaintiffs visited the defendant at his place of business, having with him samples of his goods, from which defendant made selections of goods which he orally agreed to purchase. The agent made in triplicate two lists of the goods ordered, one of which he gave to defendant, and one was forwarded to the plaintiffs. The heading.of the first of these lists reads as follows:
“Date,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. Township of ClintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Marcott v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Ashman v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Smith v. BrennanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. CusackMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Detroit Football Company v. RobinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1960
- Ter Keurst v. First State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Farmers Union Cooperative Elevator Federation v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Blumenthal v. FriedmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- FARMERS UNION COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR FED. v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1950