Legal Opinion

Blumenthal v. Friedman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1918No. 23,304PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Greene Circuit Court; Theodore E. Stinkard, Judge. Action by William Blumenthal and others against Louis Friedman. From a judgment for the defendant, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.

— Appellants brought this action against appellee to recover $504.25 for merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered by the former to the latter. A bill of particulars was filed with the complaint and made a part thereof.

Appellee answered: (1) By general denial; (2) statute of frauds. Appellants replied by general denial. The trial was by the court. The facts were found specially, conclusions of law stated thereon in favor of appellee, and over appellants’ exceptions to the conclusions of law the court rendered judgment accordingly. The only error here assigned is that the court erred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scarborough v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Kroh v. HeinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. First National Bank v. Wisdom's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  4. Weeks v. CrieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1900
  5. Brown v. SniderMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wertheimer v. Klinger Mills, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Farmers Union Cooperative Elevator Federation v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. FARMERS UNION COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR FED. v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Heckaman v. Myers Produce Creamery, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API