Legal Opinion
Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. Muscoda Local No. 123
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided August 13, 1941No. Civil Actions 5232-5234PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHREE, District Judge.
These cases, which were consolidated for trial, are actions for declaratory judgments. The plaintiffs are three corporations engaged, inter alia, in mining iron ore; they contend that the workweek of their underground ore mining employees does not include, within the meaning of Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Title 29, U.S.C.A., § 207, that portion of the time spent by those employees in being transported and in walking to and from their usual working places. The defendants are labor unions, labor union officials, and individuals, who are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Fleming v. Carleton Screw Products Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1941
- United States v. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Waialua Agr. Co., Limited v. Maneja Maneja v. Waialua Agr. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Lorenzetti v. American Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1942
- Walling v. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.