Legal Opinion

Bruckmann v. Bruckmann

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1951No. 7453PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Considered here is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, sustaining a motion of the defendants for judgment on the pleadings which consisted of an amended petition, amended answer, and a reply, the latter modified by a stipulation of the parties amounting to an amendment of such reply. Such a motion for judgment on the pleadings has long been construed to be, in effect, a demurrer by the defendant to the allegations in the pleadings favorable to the plaintiff. 31 Ohio Jurisprudence, 881, 882, 883, “Pleading,” Sections 289, 290.

It has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gugle v. LoeserOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America v. VeserOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Williams v. Village of Deer ParkOhio Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garver v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Knott v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Tracy v. RaupOhio Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API