Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America v. Veser
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
The first contention of the company is that the allegations of the amended petition state a cause of action in. neither tort nor contract. To this the plaintiff replies that his action is for breach of contract, although certain charges of negligence are made. In response to this it is urged by the company that the allegations relating to a contract are mere conclusions and therefore insufficient. An examination of the amended petition does disclose the phrase, “plaintiff entered into an agreement”, but in addition to this it is averred in detail that the contract required the doing of…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Parletto v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- McMillen v. Willys Sales Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Bruckmann v. BruckmannOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Fosdick v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.