Legal Opinion

Tracy v. Raup

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1967No. 172Published

1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, J.

The Court of Common Pleas, after sustaining defendant-appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, overruled plaintiff-appellant’s motions for a new trial and for separate findings of law and fact. Plaintiff appeals on questions of law from these rulings.

The motion for separate findings of law and fact was properly overruled. Such a motion is appropriate only when the questions of fact are tried by the court. Section 2315.22, Revised Code. This case not yet having reached the trial stage, such a motion is premature.

The subject of damages is not involved in this appeal. Omitting the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Village of Deer ParkOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Brown v. FranzOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Bruckmann v. BruckmannOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Sams v. LyonsOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Winters v. PenceOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API