Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Hallas

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 3, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

140 Conn. 387 (1953)

JACK WEINSTEIN

v.

NICK H. HALLAS ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Argued October 7, 1953.

Decided November 3, 1953.

BALDWIN, INGLIS, O'SULLIVAN, QUINLAN and WYNNE, JS.

Theodore I. Koskoff, with whom were Lester Blank and, on the brief, Raymond E. Blank, for the appellant (plaintiff).

John E. McNerney, with whom, on the brief, were Francis J. Moran and Albert R. Moquet, for the appellees (defendants).

WYNNE, J.

The plaintiff brought this action for personal injuries and damage to his automobile alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant Nick H. Hallas. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Rozycki v. Yantic Grain & Products Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Kapilonuz v. SundmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Weinstein v. HallasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API