Legal Opinion
Farmers' Exchange v. Brown
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 4, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoultoN, J.
Brown and Pelkey entered into a verbal agreement whereby Pelkey was to operate Brown’s farm “to halves.” The <only testimony concerning this agreement was given by Brown, on examination by plaintiff’s counsel, as follows:
“Q. And did you, during the years 1925-1926 have a farm in Franklin which was carried on by a man named Henry Pelkey? A. Yes, sir.
Q. What arrangement did you have with Mr. Pelkey with respect to carrying on this farm? A. We took it to halves.
Q. When you say ‘took it to halves,’ do you mean that you received half the milk checks? A. Yes, sir.
Q. Half of all the produce raised…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Ide v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- In re Bean's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
- Morgan v. StearnsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1868
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Pond v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Lambert v. Equinox House, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Sheldon v. LittleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- C. E. Johnson & Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.