Legal Opinion

Neuberger v. . Keim

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made July 9, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.

This action was brought to set aside certain deeds on the ground that they were made with the intent to defraud creditors.

The defendant Henry G. Keim was the owner of an interest in certain real property situate in the city of. Hew York, of the value of about $5,000, and on the 28th day of December, 1883, he voluntarily conveyed the same to the defendant Kate Boiler, who on the same day conveyed the same to the defendant Mary A. Keim, the wife of the defendant Henry <4. Keim, and which deeds were on the thirty-first day of December thereafter recorded in the office of the register of the city…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Place v. . HaywardNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Schreyer v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Todd v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Porter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Helm v. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Jonathan Ring & Son, Inc. v. Winola Worsted Yarn Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. In re the Estate of CampbellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. Corbin v. LitkeNew York Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API