Legal Opinion

Heagy v. Steinmark

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1919No. 9548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Weld District Court, Hon. Robert G. Strong, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court · BurkeBurke, J.

October 9, 1917, Ralph C. Heagy, one of the plaintiffs in error, entered into a written contract with Mary Stein-mark, defendant in error, selling to her the West one-half of the Northwest one-quarter of Section 1, Township 10 North, Range 60 West of the 6th P. M., in Weld County, Colorado, for the consideration of $1,000. One dollar was paid in cash, $499 was to be paid on or before November 10, 1917, and $500 on or before November 10, 1918, with interest at 8%, on deferred payments, from October 10, 1917. This contract contained the following clause: “Mutually agreed that the terms will be…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Burke.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McNaughton v. Des Moines Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. BoestlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fenimore v. StauderColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Williams v. GulickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Universal Resources Corp. v. LedfordColorado Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API