Legal Opinion

Williams v. Gulick

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 17, 1969No. 22524PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Lee.

Plaintiffs in error, Meredith Williams and Mary Louise Williams, were defendants in the trial court, and defendants in error, Peter H. Gulick and Sue S. Gulick, were plaintiffs. They will be referred to herein as “Williams” and “Gulick.”

On July 2, 1963, a written agreement was entered into by which Gulick agreed to purchase from Williams' a dwelling house in Colorado Springs. The purchase price was $22,200, of which $4,200 was paid at the time of the execution of the agreement, and the balance of $18,000 with interest at 6.25% was payable in monthly installments of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. CarmodySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Dreier v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Wishered v. NoonenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Heagy v. SteinmarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duran v. Housing Authority of County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Werner v. BakerColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Sung v. McCulloughColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Duran v. Housing Authority of County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Sung v. McCulloughColorado Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API