Legal Opinion

Collar v. Ulster & Delaware Railroad

New York County Courts

Decided May 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for damages for maintaining a nuisance.

1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.

The cause of action stated in the complaint is that the plaintiff was, and still is, the owner of the freehold situated on the easterly side of Wells avenue, in the city of Oneonta, N. Y.,. known as Ho. 11, and that the defendant is a domestic railroad corporation, duly organized, incorporated, and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York, and that it is now the owner and in pos^ session of and operates and conducts its said railroad, together with its stations, round-houses, tracks, cars, trains, engines and switches near plaintiff’s property in the said city of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. McCarty v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Hatch v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
  5. Talbott v. EnglishIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Tetirick, Gdn.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API