Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Vermont Central Railroad

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 15, 1852PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Trespass on the Case. These two cases involved very nearly the same general principles, with some difference of application to the circumstances of each. The claim of Hatch was for consequential damage to premises of his, lying near the railroad of defendants; but not taken for the purposes of the road. Plea, general issue, and trial by jury.

Read the full summary

Trespass on the Case. These two cases involved very nearly the same general principles, with some difference of application to the circumstances of each. The claim of Hatch was for consequential damage to premises of his, lying near the railroad of defendants; but not taken for the purposes of the road. Plea, general issue, and trial by jury. On trial, the plaintiff offered in evidence certain deeds of conveyance to himself of the premises, situate in Burlington, described in the declaration, dated July 13, A. D. 1839; but his title was not controverted. The plaintiff then offered testimony…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redfield, Ch. J.

The very great importance of the principal ¡question involved in this case, led, with great propriety, to an elaborate discussion at the bar, and the court have devoted all the time, at . their command, to an extended examination of all the cases cited, .and some others. It is certain there is not, as yet, a perfect coincidence of views in regard to the rights, duties, and obligations of railway corporations, either in this country or in England. But legislation is every day removing more or less of those uncertainties which have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wood v. Jackson ex dem. GenetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
  2. Parker & Edgarton v. FooteNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Lexington & Ohio Rail Road v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
  4. Thurston v. HancockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  5. Lasala v. HolbrookNew York Court of Chancery · 1833

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Coster v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Borman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Buffalo Bayou, Brazos & Colorado Railroad v. FerrisTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  5. City of Pontiac v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API