Legal Opinion

Succession of Mulqueeny

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 13, 1965No. 47709, 47710PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

This litigation involves the interpretation of certain legacies in the last will and testament of Thomas Charles Mulqueeny who departed this life on May 16, 1962.

Decedent’s last will and testament is in nuncupative form and makes no mention of his one forced heir, a daughter, Mrs. Mary Mulqueeny Prieto. The will, dated July 5, 1958, insofar as it is pertinent to this litigation, reads as follows:

“I leave the property, numbers 4513 and 4515 Eden Street, in the City of New Orleans, Louisiana, to Dorothy Blackmar, my cousins daughter. I also leave her five thousand ($5,000.00)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Succession of PriceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. Succession of VillaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  3. In Re Mulqueeny's SuccessionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Succession of TertrouSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. Succession of LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Succession of VideauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Succession of GuerreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Succession of MulqueenySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  4. Menard v. MuhsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Succession of BurgessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API