Legal Opinion
Succession of Mulqueeny
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 20, 1969No. 49163, 49172PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARHAM, Judge.
We granted certiorari on the applications of both parties (a forced heir and the executrix, who is also the principal legatee, of the Succession of Thomas Charles Mulqueeny) to review a judgment of the Court of Appeal. The district court recognized the right of the forced heir, Mrs. Mary Elizabeth Mulqueeny Prieto, to interest or fruits and 1‘evenues on her legitime from the date of the decedent’s death until delivery of the legitime. The Court of 'Appeal affirmed, but amended the calculation of interest. 207 So.2d 216.
The executrix, Mrs. Anna Elizabeth Early, filed a final…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Succession of MulqueenySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Succession of MulqueenyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mini Togs Products, Inc. v. WallaceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Toth v. Ensco Environmental Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Alexander v. AlexanderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Steele v. Compass Welding Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Succession of DittmarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.