Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Toogood

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Rehearing of case reported 23 Neb., 536. cited: Meyer v. Muscatine, 1 "Wall., 384. Humphreys v. Morton, 100 111., 592. Harper v. Ely, 70 .Id., 581. Mills a. Jefferson, 20 Wis., 54.

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. J.

This case was decided at the January term of this court of the present year, and is reported iii 23 Neb., at page 536. A rehearing was afterwards granted, upon the motion of plaintiff in error, and the cause has again been submitted, as in the first instance, without the aid of a brief or argument on the part of defendants in error.

Upon a re-examination of the cáse, we have come to the conclusion that the first decision was wrong wherein it was held that an agreement to pay interest upon interest, to accrue after the promise, could in no case be enforced. It • is believed' that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hager v. BlakeNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richardson v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hallam v. TellerenNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Steen v. StretchNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Lewis Investment Co. v. BoydNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Richardson v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API