Legal Opinion
Andrew Brown v. Ascendium
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 26, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00041Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ANDREW BROWN, Plaintiff, Case Number 2:26-cv-41 v. Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge S. Courter M. Shimeall ASCENDIUM, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Ascendium Education Solutions, Inc.’s (“Ascendium”) Motion to Dismiss pro se Plaintiff Andrew Brown’s Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (ECF No. 4.) Mr. Brown filed a response in opposition (ECF No. 10), and Ascendium replied (ECF No. 12). For the reasons stated below, the Court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.