Legal Opinion

Wellborn v. Spurwink/Rhode Island

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 25, 2005No. 2004-183-AppealPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The defendant, Spurwink/Rhode Island, appeals from a Superior Court judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Angelina M. Well-born. Spurwink argues that the trial justice should have granted its motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50 of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure, or in the alternative, that the trial justice should have granted Spur-wink’s motion for a new trial pursuant to Rule 59. This case came before the Court for oral argument on March 7, 2005, pursuant to an order directing all parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Smith v. F.W. Morse Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Robert H. CALHOUN, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. ACME CLEVELAND CORPORATION and the Cleveland Twist Drill Company, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  4. Graff v. MottaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. Casey v. Town of PortsmouthSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Children's Friend & Service v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  2. Carmella Bucci v. Hurd Buick Pontiac GMC Truck, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  3. Mead v. Papa RazziSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  4. Manning v. BELLAFIORESupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  5. Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation v. Restivo Monacelli LLPSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API