Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Gerstle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1952No. 32999Published

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The question here presented is: Did the amendments of Sections 11986 and 11991, General Code, and the enactment of Section 10502-1, General Code, upon the repeal of Section 8606, General Code, all effective January 1, 1932, bar plaintiff of her inchoate right of dower under former Section 11991, General Code, in the lands of which decedent was seized on November 13, 1918, and of which he continued to be seized until his death on March 20, 1947?

It is the contention of the plaintiff that her inchoate right of dower at the time of the divorce was not barred by the subsequent amendment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Randall v. KreigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Steinhagen v. TrullIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Ferry v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. State ex rel. Crawford v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Van Blaricum v. . LarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API