Legal Opinion

Steinhagen v. Trull

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1926No. 16956. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Dunn

A bill for the partition of the real estate of which Christoph Steinhagen was seized at the time of his death, intestate, on February 1, 1924, was filed in the circuit court of Cook county by his widow and three of his six children, who were his. heirs, against the other three children, averring, as it was later amended, that the widow was entitled to an undivided one-third interest in fee and a homestead in the premises and each of the children to an undivided one-ninth interest, subject to the widow’s homestead. The bill contained no allegation that the widow either had or had not waived…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Klokke v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Kochersperger v. DrakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wunderle v. WunderleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. McNeer v. McNeerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Burke v. Monroe CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. The People v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Loomis v. KeehnIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  3. McCormick v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. In Re Estate of KarasIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. The People v. BorgesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API