Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crawford v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1924No. 18205PublishedCited by 20 opinions

In Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

By virtue of the provisions of Section 35 of Article II of the Ohio' Constitution, limiting the benefits of workmen’s compensation insurance to workmen and their dependents, and by virtue of the provisions of Section 1465-72, General Code, limiting payment to injured employes and dependents of killed employes, and by virtue of Section 1465-88, General Code, providing that compensation before payment shall be exempt from claims of creditors and be payable only to employes or their dependents, and by virtue of Section 1465-86, General Code, conferring continuing jurisdiction upon the Industrial…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Corbett v. CorbettOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Industrial Commission v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Ayers v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
  4. Popovic v. PopovicOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API