State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Brekke
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Kourlis
I. Introduction
In these cases, both the terms of the insurance contract at issue and the applicable court rules would have allowed State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) to demand and receive a jury trial on the issue of damages. The majority overturns both the contracts and the rules on the grounds that a term within the insurance contract that limits uninsured motorist coverage to judgments resulting from “actual trials” is repugnant to public policy. In reaching that conclusion, the majority rejects the notion that an insurer, sued simultaneously with an uninsured…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Clementi v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Wheeler v. CreekmoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Lynette C.California Court of Appeal · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.