Legal Opinion

Hiney Printing Company, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Jeannine Brantner, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 16, 2001No. 99-4535, 00-3012PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Judge.

Hiney Printing Company appeals, and Jeannine Brantner cross-appeals, the district court’s grant of summary judgment in part to .Hiney Printing and in part to Brantner in this ERISA action seeking enforcement of the terms of the subrogation and reimbursement provisions of Hi- ney’s employee benefit plan. For the following reasons, we affirm the district court.

I

Hiney Printing Company has an Employee Benefit Plan established pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The Benefit Plan is set forth in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herbert Vanderklok, Cross-Appellee v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co., Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Bartling v. Fruehauf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Lake v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Copeland Oaks and Copeland Oaks Employee Benefit Plan v. Jeffrey A. Haupt and Brooke A. HauptCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Rodriguez v. Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Christina Murphy Minadeo v. Ici Paints D/B/A the Glidden CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Spears Ex Rel. Estate of McCargo v. RuthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Rosalyn Caffey v. Unum Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API