Legal Opinion

Spitznagel v. State Bd. of Edn., 07ap-757 (11-20-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 2008No. 07AP-757PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellees, State Board of Education ("the board"), and Bedford City School District ("BCSD"), have applied for reconsideration of this court's judgment in Spitznagel v. State Bd. ofEdn., Franklin App. No. 07AP-757, 2008-Ohio-5059. Plaintiffs-appellants, Brian P. Spitznagel et al. ("appellants"), have filed a memorandum in opposition to the application, and the application is now submitted to this court for decision.

{¶ 2} "App. R. 26 provides a mechanism by which a party may prevent miscarriages of justice that could arise when an appellate court makes an obvious error…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State v. OwensOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Erie Insurance Exchange v. Colony Development Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spitznagel v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Norman v. Kellie Auto Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Spitznagel v. State Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Spitznagel v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API