Legal Opinion

Spitznagel v. State Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2010No. 2009-0015PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

I

{¶ 1} This case presents two questions for our review: (1) is it error to find that a territory transfer would cause significant detriment to the fiscal or educational operation of the transferring school district under Ohio Adm.Code 3301-89-02(B)(9) based only upon a showing of a potential loss of revenue, and (2) is it error to rely upon racial factors in a denial of a school transfer petition when the racial impact is found to be de minimis?

{¶ 2} We hold that evidence of a loss of revenue is a legally sufficient basis for the State Board of Education to determine that a territory transfer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lorain City School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Board of Education v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bartchy v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hall China Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Spitznagel v. State Bd. of Edn., 07ap-757 (11-20-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Edmands v. State Med. Bd. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Campus Pitt Stop, L.L.C. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. D.L. Lack Corp. v. CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Clayton v. Ohio Bd. of NursingOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Inner City Living, Inc. v. Dept. of Dev. DisabilitiesOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API