Legal Opinion
Erie Insurance Exchange v. Colony Development Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 15, 2000No. 99AP-329 and 99AP-335PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lazarus, Judge.
Pursuant to Civ.R. 26(A), plaintiff-appellee, Erie Insurance Exchange (“Erie”), has filed a motion for reconsideration of this court’s opinion rendered in this matter on December 23, 1999. For the reasons that follow, we deny the motion.
In our original opinion, we held that Erie had a duty to defend its insured, Colony Development Corporation (“Colony”), in the underlying litigation brought against Colony by The Ravines at Parkwick Drive Condominium Association (the “Association”), because certain claims alleged in the underlying complaint were arguably or potentially covered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Preferred Risk Insurance v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Matthews v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
- Lennar Corp. v. Great American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- K & L Homes, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Corder v. William W. Smith Excavating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Burlington Insurance v. PMI America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.