Legal Opinion

Esso Standard Oil Company v. Bigelow-Clark, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 28, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6378PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, speaking through the Assistant Commissioner, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, dismissing a notice of opposition by Esso Standard Oil Company, appellant, to the registration by BigelowClark, Inc., appellee, of the word “Parm” as a trademark for an antiseptic rubefacient for massaging, and as a palliative for minor cuts, bruises, and skin irritations, in Class 19 — Medicines and Pharmaceutical Preparations.

The opposition was based, in part, on opposer’s use of the mark “Parmo,” and, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Shoe Corporation v. Lerner Bros. Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  2. Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. The May Department Stores Company v. Schloss Bros. & Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. The May Department Stores Company v. Kenya CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Plastron, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Gillette Company v. "42" Products Ltd., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Falk Corp. v. Toro Manufacturing Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. Esso Standard Oil Company v. Bigelow-Clark, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  4. The Gillette Company v. "42" Products Ltd., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API