Legal Opinion

Falk Corp. v. Toro Manufacturing Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 4, 1974No. Patent Appeal No. 9190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 176 USPQ 221 (1972), sustaining, by a divided vote, an opposition to appellant’s application for registration of TORUS as a trademark for “rubber element shaft couplings,” serial No. 344,845, filed November 28, 1969. We reverse.

The Board Opinions

The majority of the board, after reciting five of appellee’s registrations of the mark TORO, reviewing its extensive advertising and sales of lawn-care equipment and parts therefor under the mark, and comparing TORO with TORUS, concluded there would be…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paula Payne Products Co. v. Johnson Publishing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. In re FielderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Application of Thomas F. FaciusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Application of Knapp-Monarch CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. FordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Sports Authority Michigan, Inc. v. The PC Authority, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2002
  2. The Toro Company v. ToroHead, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API