Hottel v. Poudre Valley Reservoir Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the- District Court of Larimer County. Hon.- J ames E. Garrigues, Judge. Action by B. P. Hottel and J. A. Banning against The Poudre Valley Reservoir Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff Hottel appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
One of the plaintiffs below, J. A. Banning, who is not a party to this appeal, entered into a written contract with the defendant reservoir company whereby, for the consideration, and in accordance with the plans and specifications therein named, he agreed to construct its ditch, which was to be about thirty-one miles long. Banning began work about the 15th of August and continued thereat until about October 18th following, when he then threw up the contract.
By a written instrument, of date October 22, he assigned, transferred and sub-let to George W. Temple & Co. all of his right, title and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Herrick v. Estate of BelknapSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- Reed v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Wells v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- B. F. & C. M. Davis Co. v. W. E. Callaghan Const. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Wilson v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1918
- Grout v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Griffith v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Nunn v. BrillhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.